A Few Thoughts on Image Upload Usage at Preceden

One of Preceden’s most popular feature requests over the years has been the ability to upload images to Preceden and have those images appear on timelines.

A lot of competitors offer that functionality, but I procrastinated for almost 9 years for two reasons:

  1. It’s complex to implement, both in terms of actually handling the uploads and having them appear on the timelines.
  2. Most of the people that requested it were using Preceden for school timelines and that segment of users tend not to upgrade at a high rate. People using Preceden for work-related project planning timelines didn’t request it much. Therefore, it never was much of a priority because it likely wouldn’t move the needle on the business.

That said, since I’ve had more time to work on Preceden recently, I decided to finally do it. For handling uploads, I wound up using Filestack.com which simplified the implementation a lot. And updating Preceden’s rendering logic took time too, but in the end it all worked out.

I recently checked on the usage stats and – not surprisingly – it’s used most heavily by people using Preceden for education:

Screen Shot 2018-11-15 at 2.27.44 PM.png

For users that have signed up since this launched:

  • Teaching: 29% uploaded an image
  • School: 26%
  • Personal Use: 16%
  • Work: 12%

In other words, it’s used very heavily (which is great!) but not with the segment of users with the highest propensity to pay.

This dilemma comes up fairly often: do you build Feature A that will be used heavily by mostly-free users, or Feature B that will be used heavily by mostly-paying customers?

For better or worse, I never wound up focusing on one market or use case with Preceden: it’s a general purpose timeline maker that can be used for any type of timeline. As a result though, I often get into these situations. If I was just building Preceden for project planners, I’d never implement image uploads. If I was just building it for students creating timelines for school, I’d probably have implemented it years ago.

It also comes down to goals: if my main goal is growing revenue, I probably shouldn’t work on features like this. But if I want Preceden to be the best general purpose timeline maker then it does, but there’s an opportunity cost because I’m not building features for the folks who will actually pay.

I operate in the middle for product development: work mostly on features that will make money, but also spend some percentage of my time on features like this that will make it a better general purpose tool.

If I were to start something from scratch today, I’d probably pick a narrow niche and try to nail it. No general-purpose tools. I’d recommend that to others too.

Going broad is fun in a way too though, it just has it’s challenges :).

 

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s